E7EVEN - you b******s

So, my ISP has just gone out of business. To continue I was "forced" (by re-direction) to sign up to someone masquerading under the Tiscali banner - EzeeDSL

Comments

andyelcomb said…
You're not alone there - exactly the same situation.
Couldn't be arsed to rig up the dialup system again (after doing it earlier in the year thanks to E7's "upgrading"), so went along with the eezedsl site.

Have to say it did get me back online pretty quick but I'm not convinced it's the best priced package about.
Might stick it for the year and then revamp the whole telephony thing.

Have completed the online E7 refund request - will be very interesting to see how much of my owed £130 turns up (or when). Suppose I'll have to contact my credit card co. and try and claim that way if nothings happens within the month.
5:33 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Spiralling cost of error fixing story

Ok, now this tale comes from a lecture I attended at Swansea University in about 1975. Truth is, I don't know if it was made up by the lecturer, whose name I forget, or whether it's a fact. Googling comes up with nothing. Anyhow, here it is. The subject was "How much does an error cost to fix?". The lecturer wrote a single line of FORTRAN code on the board: DO 10 I = 1,3 "Now when the programmer took this down to be punch-carded onto Hollerith cards the typist made a mistake. They entered: DO 10 I = 1.3 How much to fix the change from a full-stop to a comma?" A long discussion followed - nothing if the programmer had spotted the mistake by checking the card immediately, more if it was found during testing and finally a lot if the project had already been delivered. He gave us the answer: "$50,000,000. It was in the aerial alignment code of NASA's Pioneer spacecraft. It should loop 3 times to line " 10 CONTINUE " in an a...
Read more

"The delivery extension for this subscription could not be loaded" when using SSRS

Image
OK, so we upgraded our server farm and put on the latest "stuff" (SSRS, SQL Server etc.) and the engineers gave me two servers to play with - SQL01 & SQL02. The idea being that we used high availability to help keep the factory running. We employed a contractor to load up and configure everything. At this point I wasn't involved. My involvement was to move all the reports and subscriptions from the old servers to the new ones once the servers had been configured. All went swimmingly, until I actually started to fire off the subscriptions to test them. Randomly (like 5 out of 10) I got the error in the title. I would edit the failing subscription and/or change the schedule time and it would work. I finally got around to moving 81 subscriptions for the same report (all slightly different parameters going to about 6 different engineers). I press the "go" button and every single one failed. Let's cut out the long story about how I went through about...
Read more

Dacia Duster Mark 2 Roof Rails

Image
Well, after about 3 months of waiting, Dacia UK have finally got back to me about the roof rails on my Mark 2 Duster. I asked a simple question - "Are the ' holes ' at the front and back of the roof rails load-bearing?". Reason being is that the roof bars supplied with my Mark 1 (top pic) don't fit around the thicker rails of the Mark 2 (bottom pic):    (photo from DaciaForum.co.uk) The old bars do fit through the holes , so you are tempted to fit them at that position. However, the reply from Dacia is as follows: Initially, we thought that the holes at either end of the roof bars were load bearing, should you want to fit a roof rack to the bars, however, after having contacted the Product manager from Dacia, I have now been informed that they are not load bearing for you r Duster MK2. So, no, you can't safely use the holes. HTH 
Read more